Return to CreateDebate.commrarmy • Join this debate community

mrarmy


Svargas's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Svargas's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

In our history we have seen that prohibition doesnt work. They tried to prohibit alcohol and it didnt work so why would they try to do it again. People will do what they want wether its illegal or not. For some its the thrill of getting caught. Marijuana wouldnt be an issue if people wouldnt use it in an excessive amount. It can be used for medicinal purposes so why shouldnt it be leagalized its not harming anyone.

1 point

What are the major changes in the industrial era back then and now? Like the working conditions, wages, and working hours.

1 point

I think that the United States would fall appart because we depend on china to much and they depend on us equally. Our economy would plunge because we would not have any imported goods we rely on other countries to get us the goods we need if China was not appart of that then we would have some big problems.

1 point

It was a good choice because it turned into the main place to travel through to get goods shipped to different places. It saved time and money but it took to many peoples lives in order to make it. But now people dont uses the pamama canal that much mostly things are shipped to different places by planes instead of ships.

1 point

I agree with you because there wouldt be U.S history without the Progressive Movement. It provided us with better protection from harsh working conditions and it protected us from rotten food. Now its steralized and not contaminated and much safer.

1 point

I disagree with you because yea the U.S is trying to help but they are trying to hard. The help is turning into a problem when other countries are not likeing the help. Most of the countries arent even asking for help but since they are in a poor position the U.S automatically thinks that they need help when most of the other countries are progressing on their own. Help is not always needed.

1 point

I agree because Barak Obama didnt change racism if anything the reasons most people dot like him is because they are racist. Most people dont really give reasons why they dont like him because hey are embarassed to admit that they are showing racism towards him. Racism is always going to be here and it will never change because people cant except the fact that other people are different and because they are that they should be in a lower class or they find themselfs in a higher position to other people. Its not right and people should just get over themselves for discriminating other races. There never just going to disappear get over it.

1 point

I agree with you because the United States does think that they are better that all of the other countries which causes big problems with wars and other things. If the U.S keeps thinking they are better and can do whatever then it will not run smoothly. We need to have other countries think differently we have no need to make other countries afraid of us and to intimidate them when they arent a threat untill we get overly confident and find a reason to start an argument. We are not above the rest what happeded to everyone being equal beacause apparently its not happening.

1 point

I think that our working conditons are deffinaltly better now then they were back then. But some areas in the U.S still dont have great working conditions. The U.S has gotten better child labor laws but we need to get other countries around us to pick up on our labor laws because most kids in other countries still get payed less and there working conditions arent that great.

1 point

I agree because they didnt know what they were fighting for but they were just told to join the war and fight. None of the soldiers knew why they were there but they were proud to be fighting for their country. The germans were told by many of the people around them to join the war like there was that teacher who told his whole class to join and fight.

1 point

I agree with this because the Spanish American war could have been avoided butthe americans had to show that they had power over other countries which was not needed. Because we had to much nationalism that we thought we were better and that there were no problems to be resolved.

1 point

I disagree because without collective bargining should be passed with restrictions. If the employers could choose if they wanted to put more money into health care then they would most likely not put alot in health care. They wouldnt because everyone is out for their own and everyone wants more money.

1 point

I support this becasue collective bargining is a really great way to have negotiation in Wisconisn. Without negotiation people would get fired for no reason and we wouldnt have our rights. We need colective bargining to keep our rights in tack.

1 point

I disagree witht this becasue without Unions all of the jobs wouldnt work properly and yeathere are laws about wages n saftey but the Unions would be a back up for all of those things.

1 point

I think that Unions are still needed in the U.S. They are needed because Unions raise the wages for more low and middle class workers. The Union would set standards for all work places like pensions, wage premiums, and benifits. A Union would make a cushion for all work places to fall back on because they support them. Unions would make work places in the U.S easier.

0 points

I disagree with you because i am a business owner and if you have a problem suck it up or talk to your boss about the situations. Instead of striking all its doing is getting u payed less because your not working. The pinkertons would treat you better if you just went back to work if they have to use brute force then they should becasue you are doing what your suppose to be doing your job.

1 point

As a wealthy business owner I am for the use of Pinkertons, they will help control the protest outside my business. They are like cops and will take care of all of my workers that are protesting. My business shouldnt be a place where my workers are goofing off and protesting they should be working and not wasting time. The pinkertons would make protests not happen because they would make my workers go back to work. If they dont like the conditions they are in then they can quit and stop compaining about not getting enough money. So we should use pinkertons.

1 point

As a wealthy business owner I can make you work place safer for your children as long as they work for longer hours. If you want more money for your family you will let your children work as long as they want. But they have to work hard. If your children work less hours than my business wouldnt be making enough money and your pay would be cut and you would get payed less that you usually would be payed.

2 points

I am against this bill because as a business owner I dont want any ristrictions on my business. I should be able to choose how I want my business to run. There shouldnt be a bill ristricting on what I can and cand do with my business. Also there shouldnt be a bill limiting child labor hours. If the children want to work to get more money they should work longer. Children make a great percentage of our products and a bill saying that goods made by them cant be sold is outrageous. All of our products made by them cant be sold is unreal because my business would go bankrupt withouht the products the children being sold. So there shouldnt be a bill limiting ristrictions on my business.

1 point

As a wealthy business owner you shouldnt worry about the immigrant workers. If you continue to work hard and your children will work hard when they get their first job. The immigrants work just as hard but if you wor hard you wont have to worry about getting a good job.

1 point

As a wealthy business owner you shouldnt worry about the immigrant workers. If you continue to work hard and your children will work hard when they get their first job. The immigrants work just as hard but if you wor hard you wont have to worry about getting a good job.

1 point

I am against this because I am a wealthy business owner and more workers make more products. The immigrants will be pleased with just getting some money and I could pay them less. They are more willing to work than the workers I have now so if they want to come and work for me there should be no limit on immigrants.

1 point

The amount of money you get will depend on how hard you are working if you arent working hard then you wont get payed enough.Its you fault for not working hard enough. Stop complainging when its you fault for getting payed in pennies. I am a wealthy business owner and if other business owners pay you in pennies for no reason that isnt fairthey you should find a different place to work at.

1 point

I disagree with this because I am a wealthy business owner and if there was a minimum wage we wouldnt be getting enough money to keep our business in order and runing well. I wouldnt necessarily pay children less if they are working hard then they will get payed just as well. But if someone is not worknig well they will get payed less. I am paying you enough depending on hard you are working.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]