People will still do it and transport it so prohibition doesnt work. Even if we would legalize it there would be problems like with the alcohol after legalizing it. There would be alot of problems with people being high and drunk and not taking care of them selves or others. It would just be crazy in the cities because every one would be either high or drunk at least now they try to hide it when there high and wont cause as much problems.
We will more than likelly evolve into smarter beings. There are new species being created every year. If we can find out how to harness the energy of a black hole we can transport to diffrent world or universes. And there will be many more wars.
One thing I really followed for current events this year is colective barganing rights for state employees. I think collective barganing is not needed because if the state employees get to bargin why dont other people that work in diffrent places like a store not get bargaining rights? It is time for some of these state employees to pay up like govorner walker said.Tthey have so many rights compaired to the other people to work in this state that we need to get our money back in some way to get the budget deficite lower so we arnt one of the most broke states. So we are going to get money from th bargining rights so we can get some money for more important thing like the roads and more things for the whole state. Here is a link about it. http://www.jsonline.com/news/
I think if the US didnt make the panama canal we would be a third world country. It was one of our bigger acomplishments and it got our economy up because we wouldnt be making as much money because we wouldnt be getting money from the use of the canal plus we would need to go around south america and all the way around if it was never finished. http://svocelot.com/Chris/School/
To start with everything you disputed had nothing to do with the collective bargaining rights. collective barging is were the teachers like get certain holidays off and like get a reduced price on insurance so you might want to read the articles up there on the top. but they still have all there right and freedom of speech and cant be fired for no reason.
If state employees get bargaining rights why don't all other people like lets say people working at a grocery store? Plus state employees have like all holidays off and they main people striking at the capital were the teachers and they get all summer off and almost all major holidays off.
I think collective barganing is not needed because if the state employees get to bargin why dont other people that work in diffrent places like a store not get bargaining rights? It is time for some of these state employees to pay up like govorner walker said.Tthey have so many rights compaired to the other people to work in this state that we need to get our money back in some way to get the budget deficite lower so we arnt one of the most broke states. So we are going to get money from th bargining rights so we can get some money for more important thing like the roads and more things for the whole state.
I think unions are not needed because children have laws for minimum age to work and how long you can work. also theres laws for minimum wage and working condition. If they fire you for no real reason theres laws for that to where you can get you job back if they have no legit excuse for firing you.
There is no need for the pinkertons because if they come in they will make everything violant. When you call in the pinkertons and it gets violant people could get hurt and just not work for you and then you would have to hire more people and then another strike will propoble happen.
I am against the use of pinkertons because I am a female worker. I dont want to be beaten up or bullied because were on strike even though we arnt violant. If we arnt violant calling in the pinkertons will make us violant and only mak your compony look really bad. Also there can be deaths involved with that so i dont think theres a reason to bring in the pinkertons unless it gets violant.