I believe that some things need to be changed while others can stay the same.

Pinkertons are unneccesary, because if you paid your workers better, they wouldn't go on strike and then your company wouldn't have any problems.

I agree with you Aron, because peopel have different talents today, and people are not workin on the assembly line anymore, but they still do jobs that do need a little different pay.

I agree with you Cody, because Pinkertons use unneccesary force and they can show bad examples for child workers, and that could be a problem later down the road.

If you made good negotiations, the union workers wouldnt go on strike and then you wouldn't have to worry about your employees not working. So the main point is to give employees good salaries.

Pinkertons stop strikes, and that helps companies and causes most union workers to get reprimanded and could reduce pay. As a union worker, I believe that Pinkertons are an unneccesary use of force against strikes.

I think that we should have kept collective bargaining because it then they will be able to negotiate a fair salary that the companies may not want to give to employees.

I don't think that unions are needed anymore, because people now have more training and specialize in different areas and I don't think that everyone should get paid the same for different jobs. Now that machines do most of the factory work today, people need to be able to process and be educated in many areas in order to get a job, so they would have to go to college and then that gives you a big loan to try to pay back, that's why you should get a higher raise than someone who didn't go to college. And that is what unions believe in, equal pay no matter how much training you need.

I agree with you Jake, because some of the jobs are a little more dangerous and stressful and that could really ruin a child's life. Another reason is that older union workers really need to get jobs and work to make money, while the children are dependent on their family and they really don't have to pay for much of their own necessities.

I agree with this bill, because it would make kids work less and give Union workers, like myself, a chance to get a job. It would also be a lot easier to put these tasks on union workers, because they do not have school or educations that they have to go to, while the all the working children have to go to school and work after, so it would be very tiring for children and not so much for union workers.

The only problem you would have is that Americans would not consume as much of your products if you let immigrants work instead of Americas, so you may be having less expense, but your income would also be much smaller too.

The only problem you would have is that Americans would not consume as much of your products if you let immigrants work instead of Americas, so you may be having less expense, but your income would also be much smaller too.

I don't think we need anymore immigrants, because they could start taking away the jobs of the citizens that already live here. I want to believe that my kids and grandkids will be able to live a good life and be able to work, but if the immigrants keep coming, there would be too hard of a contest for a job. It would be like hitting the jackpot to get a job.

I agree with you Jake, because then a skilled worker would be willing to do his job with more quality because he has a better pay. And if he didn't have a very good salary, he would care less in his work and the company's products aren't as good.

I disagree with you Kollin, because there should be at least a base rule that keeps you're employees a little happier because otherwise they could be underpaid too much and cause problems within the compay. It should be high enough that it doesn't cause you to go out of business, and just enough for you to make a small profit of your own.

The only problem with working so long is that it causes many problems with family issues and causes people to get frustrated and causes many conflicts within a company, so it could cause the company to have a low morale and that is not good for business.

I believe there should a limit, becauuse otherwise people who not have a chance to enjoy the things outside of work. Another reason is that the working conditions are poor and people would get tired and possibly cause injury to themselves or others.

I agree with Collin, because we then the workers can have more free time to enjoy life and the free time. Another reason is because fatigue and tiredness could cause errors and you could injure yourself, because you may not be entirely awake while doing your job.