but is it right for people to have voter I.D. because of their age, gender, or race?

i think that the reconstruction was a sucess because without it the slaves wouldn't be freed.

I dont think there should be voter I.D. because i think that anyone should be able to vote no matter the age, gender, and race i think that anyone should be able to vote but you should be able to understand politics before you vote.

I think that the reconstruction for the most part is a sucess for the blacks because they got freed and they wanteed to unite the country again. after the souuth lost the was the north and south were united and the slaves were freed so I think that the reconstructioin was a sucess.

I think that we should have voter I.D. laws because some people shouldn't be able to vote for example people should have to show their I.D's and if they dont have an I.D. then they dont vote because they dont not have an I.D. because they dont want it there has to be a reason.

i agree with you but it is still illegal. So are you saying that weed shouldnt be illegal?

this is a youtube video the shows what michaael vick was doing and tells why and how he started it up http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZYk91q0Tyk

i used the computers by finding the court cases on michael vick adn i was able to find different information on it and being able to have the computers extend the information you have or want to learn.

i confirm my viewpoint on thinking that what michael vick did is bad and i am against the guy that defended him in court because even if the dogs were his property that didnt give him the right to fight them.

http://aldf.org?arcticle.php?id=928 this is a court case on michael vicks dog fighting

some people believed that what micheal vick did wasnt a bad thing. for example someone that was defending him said that "if he goes to jail he is being locked up for no reason because the dogs are his property so i shouldnt matter" i disagree with him.

http://www.pet-abuse.com/cases/11312/VA/ US/

i think it wasnt right because the dogs had no choice if they faught or not becuase the dogs were trained to fight. after michael vick was caught most of the dogs were placed in homes.

http://ablf.org/arcticle.php?id=928 http://hamptonroads.com/2009/07/timeline-michael-vick-dogfighting-case

do you think that after michael vick did his time and paid his fine do you he should have been able to play football again?

my topic is about michael vick and his illegal dog fighting ring which was called "Bad Newz Kennels" and he kept and trained over 50 dogs and he admitted on killing 8 or his worst dogs by drowning or hanging them.

Liberal because change is a good thing and you should be able to accept the change and changes.

Liberal because everyhting is changing and when things change you have to either not accept of accept the changes being made.

Liberal because everything is always changing and we have to agree and change with it also.