Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 19 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 93% |
Arguments: | 20 |
Debates: | 0 |
but is it right for people to have voter I.D. because of their age, gender, or race?
i think that the reconstruction was a sucess because without it the slaves wouldn't be freed.
I dont think there should be voter I.D. because i think that anyone should be able to vote no matter the age, gender, and race i think that anyone should be able to vote but you should be able to understand politics before you vote.
I think that the reconstruction for the most part is a sucess for the blacks because they got freed and they wanteed to unite the country again. after the souuth lost the was the north and south were united and the slaves were freed so I think that the reconstructioin was a sucess.
I think that we should have voter I.D. laws because some people shouldn't be able to vote for example people should have to show their I.D's and if they dont have an I.D. then they dont vote because they dont not have an I.D. because they dont want it there has to be a reason.
i agree with you but it is still illegal. So are you saying that weed shouldnt be illegal?
this is a youtube video the shows what michaael vick was doing and tells why and how he started it up http://www.youtube.com/
i used the computers by finding the court cases on michael vick adn i was able to find different information on it and being able to have the computers extend the information you have or want to learn.
i confirm my viewpoint on thinking that what michael vick did is bad and i am against the guy that defended him in court because even if the dogs were his property that didnt give him the right to fight them.
http://aldf.org?arcticle.php?id=928 this is a court case on michael vicks dog fighting
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |