mrarmy

I only bring this up because take Obamacare for an example... Nobody knew he was going to implement such a law when he ran in 2008 and nobody voted for him based on that position. He deceived everybody and then passed it when he had the power to as president. Over 60% of the country wants it repealed but it's law of the land because we relied on politicians and corrupt judges to preserve our rights. If we granted ourselves the power to have the final say if a law passes or not based on a populous vote a law like that would have never passed!

This is what I find to be a very interesting perspective that I came up with my own. Instead of letting a supreme court that ultimately makes the final decision on laws that affect the whole country, why not give that power to the people? After all it is obvious that we often vote people into office without knowing their belief on everything! I say keep everything in place but at the end of the process create a more direct democracy for the final say or option.

You're seeing under your very eye's the Government gaining more power and it's affects. Individual sovereignty being assaulted and mass debt!

Read the disputes of how the country operated under the Articles of Confederation and you'll see why our system is perfect and how separation would be bad!

I think a better question is if you would support the additional amendments added to the constitution by FDR... It seems ever since them this country has been heading down a self-destructive path!