KArLeYq's Waterfall
Ok, i disagree. he pretty much said that he was going ot change Wisconsin and said what he was gunna do. Just because some people don't like change very much doesn't ean that he hsould just be recalled. I do however agree with the fact that how he went about doing things to change the state weren't that great but still.
The other day on the news I heard about a woman who was caught with a .38 caliber pistol on an American Airlines flight in Dallas, TX. By the time the pilot stopped the plane to try and get her off of it, she was already gone. The eventually caught her though. http://www.nydailynews.
Well, in Dred Scott's case his owner, Peter Blow brought him and the other laves he owned to Illinois, a free state for four years. Then Blow decided to move them all back to Missouri, a save state where Blow later died. Scott felt that since he had been livng n a free state for so long that he should have the right to become a citizen. In other cases I am not sure what the purpose of slave owners bringing their slaves to the North.
I agree Kassi. To be honest, he did everything he said he was going to do when the people of Wisconsin elected him. It's not like they didn't know what was coming or what was going ot happen. I just think that the whole thing is stupid. I saw some people in front of Walmart holding up recall Walker signs. So dumb, what a waste of time.
One thing that I learned from the Amanda Knox movie was that the judge in the trial, Guliano Mignini was trying to get Amanda to confess to the crime because his own reputation was turning bad because he had been accused of misconduct on case he was apart of in the 70's about the Monster of Florence who killed young lovers in the foothills of Italy. http://abcnews.go.com/International/
