I also think it is dangerous for the government to monitor what users do on the internet because it just opens more doors for hackers to find ways to gain information and use it. It could also cause identity theft.

If the government watches the websites on the internet then they would know if there is illegal content. But they should remove the website and not the users from the internet. If the illegal or inappropriate websites are removed then the internet would be safer for all.

With the advancements in technology, the government should have a quick easy way that users could report hacking and illegal content. That way the government would find out about it and wouldn't have to monitor all users.

The government is taking away our freedom of speech by tracking and regulating what individuals post on their accounts. Privacy should be given until you have messed up by using illegal websites then their actions should be monitored.

I think they should be able to monitor public networks but private networks should not be under the governments control.

I agree on the issue of invading our privacy. There has already been cases of people hacking in to webcams and watching people. That is not acceptable.

I agree because if you are behaving on the internet you shouldn't be monitored. If you are not doing legal things then you should be monitored.

I think that the government should be able to regulate what websites are on the internet. If the content is harmful or illegal then they should take it off. But if they regulate what we post in social sites then it is invading our privacy and taking away our freedom of speech.

I agree that the president shouldnt be able to decide what has to be redone but the people elect representatives to elect the president by electoral votes. The people are putting their trust in the representatives and if the person with the most electoral votes is elected president, then they should have more power

I agree because the president would have too much power if he could veto anything he want. He belongs to the executive branch and if he could veto anything that means the executive branch would over power the other two branches.

The constitution gives us the freedom of speech, the freedom of religion, and also the freedom to petition. This allows the citizens to share their voice and form a stronger government run by the people. We are allowed to voice our opinions, follow what ever religion we want, and sign petitions to voice our beliefs for the good of the country

The constitution does not only help keep our government strong and equal, it helps decide what laws should be passed in a good way. Without the constitution, the country would not have strong military forces and we would be a weak government and the people of our country wouldn't be treated how they are.

I would have passed the Constitution because it helps make our country fair and it gives equal rights to the people and helps keep a strong, powerful government. The federal and state governments have to balance the power in the governments so that one person or branch doesn't take too much power. States also have to use government branches to make sure the laws and ideas they pass are constitutional.