Sure, but a lot of the things people would look up to find some of the things we don't want them seeing, they'd have to have something at least slightly related to what they're trying to find. You're not going to look up "Rocks" and find military blueprints.
Sure, the regulation would stop hackers and maybe save money, but it would also be VERY costly. Imagine how long it would take to regulate everything on every website. The interent is HUGE. Take into account all the people that would take and they also need a salary, therefore making it more costly than money-saving.
I don't think the government should be able to control the internet, but it should be able to control what's on the internet. Instead, the government should enforce stricter privacy policies on websites with more important persoanl information, like banks, insurance, private government, and websites that want your social security number, to make it harder to get into.
I think the Judicial branch is equally important to government as the other two branches. The third branch creates for better checks and balances, due to the fact that if there were only two, the first could always take away from the second and vice versa.
I never said that we wanted a President to severly alter our government, just sort of direct it towards his opinions. Not all government changes require money, some just require a slight change of heart or mind. Government is completely decided by the people. The House and Senate representatives reflect the opinions of the people, so there's no way we would ever have completely equal Democrat and Republican numbers. I think a person who conforms to a new opinion just because it's Obama's opinion is a terrible politician because his vote no longer reflects his opinion or the opinion of the people. Is that not the purpose of government, to reflect the opinions of the people?