Return to CreateDebate.commrarmy • Join this debate community

mrarmy



Welcome to mrarmy!

mrarmy is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS MichaelB1

Reward Points:16
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
89%
Arguments:30
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
10 most recent arguments.
1 point

I agree that the Civil War reconstruction was a success but the Iraqi reconstruction I felt was a failure because we are still fighting with them. We might be helping them out but we are still fighting

1 point

I change my mind. Iraqi recnstruction WAS a failure because we are still fighting. Were not done fighting over there and in order to reconstruct we need to be out of the war.

0 points

The reconstruction also helped bring industrialization to the South and more farming to the North.

2 points

I agree that both were a huge success. It did a great job of keeping the government on track economically and from corruption. They did a nice job of bringing us out of the war.

2 points

The reconstruction was a success because we kept slavery out of our country and we were able to bring the North and South back together

1 point

Yeah but without voter ID's people might vote more than once and then the candidate we truly want won't go into office because people vote multiple

1 point

Yeah that why there should be voter ID laws so that doesn't happen and we end up getting somebody in office that nobody wants like the current.

-1 points

I think that they should pass voter ID laws because then people can't take others identities and Obama won't be president anymore. They won't have people voting more than once so then the elcetion could be fair.

1 point

If Scott Walker becomes preisdent, life is good. He knows what he is talking about unlike Obama and Obama spends all the money on vacation instead of on the government. Walker would spend it all on the government.

1 point

Yeah really. If they wanted to be in the U.S., get a passport because they will be caught at some point. They shouldn't be jumping the border. It takes away the jobs we provide for Americans.

MichaelB1 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here